- The Case for Brand
- Posts
- The Extraordinary Cost of Being Dull
The Extraordinary Cost of Being Dull
Or, is your advertising the equivalent of lighting money on fire? đĽ

The âextraordinary cost of being dullâ is a term Peter Field and Adam Morgan coined to describe advertising that has little to no impact on people. Over â of advertising (!) falls into this category, and is the equivalent of lighting your ad spend on fire đĽ
Who will love this:
People who get angry at boring ads
People who get excited about ads that arenât boring
Anyone whoâs binged SuperBowl ad and struggled to name more than 3 that were actually memorable
Anyone whoâs ever been given creative feedback to âtone it down a littleâ
Today
Iâm on a plane right now, but thanks to the wonders of technology, Iâm going to lecture share some thoughts about dull ads.
Marketing isnât rocket science, but there is measurable science to show us what ads move people. And the bottom line is this: dull ads donât move people.
Letâs define what we mean by âdull.â
Dull ads are ads that leave people feeling nothing. And if you think that most ads are boringâŚyouâre right.
A study last year demonstrated that most advertising is dull and doesnât make a long term impact on business. In researcher Peter Fieldâs words, âThe big problem for ad effectiveness these days is the ocean of dull advertising that generates no emotional responses at all.â đ
One of the most important things you can do as a brand builder is push for more creative bravery. Unfortunately, I think marketers have been overly reliant on âsoftâ arguments like âhumans are storytelling animals.â This is true. But like any good marketer: you need to speak to your audience. And if youâre a CMO, your audience is a founder, a board of directors, or shareholders who care about the bottom line. And sometimes, you need the cold hard data to back you up in the boardroom.
Thatâs part of why I started this newsletter: to give creatively frustrated brand builders the tools, the case studies and the stats to make the case for brand in the boardroom.
Letâs dive in đ
đ¤ The rule:
Money spent on dull advertising is wasted money.
âĄď¸ Implication:
Make ads that elicit an emotional response from people.
â Avoid this common mistake:
Throwing more media dollars at boring ads (because theyâre not working).
đ The case study:
A study of 32,500 ads shows that over â of all advertising today has no long term impact on a business. That means that the cost of production, plus the media spend supporting the promotion of the creative work, is utterly wasted. ThatâsâŚdisappointing, to say the least, and alarming, if youâre responsible for the health and growth of a business.
đ° The bottom line:
Make people care about your brand and message by making interesting, emotive advertising.
đ¨âđŹ The OGs behind this research:
Peter Field and Adam Morgan.
Summary
The cost of dull advertising is common sense to any good marketer, but itâs helpful to have facts to back yourself up when youâre talking to people who are more comfortable in boardrooms than creative reviews. And the facts donât lie: Boring ads arenât memorable. Be memorable. Itâs how strong brands are built. And itâs way more fun.
đ Brand scoops catching my attention this week
This letter from Chime to âunlock Americaâs paychecksâ
Another in-house agency debate
Pricey Seattle co-op PCCâs annual letter to members asking customers to âstrengthen their commitment to the co-opâ after another no-dividend year (not mentioned in the annual letter: aggressive expansion)
Thatâs all! âď¸ Iâm off to London âď¸. If you have recommendations for delicious food or interesting shops, Iâm all ears đ
Amanda
Was this message forwarded to you? Need to make the case for brand? Sign up below đ
Question? Hot takes? Brands you want to see covered? Hit reply âŠď¸